The other day, J showed me a picture someone had posted on Facebook- a young man was holding up a sign with his name, birthdate, and place of birth. The lengthy caption underneath said that he’d been adopted as an infant, and although it was a closed adoption, he was very interested in finding his birth parents, and could social media help him? Did anyone have any information about him or his birth, and could they share? And of course, could everyone seeing this picture “like” and “share” it?
Of course, the man and his wife had contacted his adoption agency and gotten no information, which is why they were turning to social media, and which is why this ASTOUNDING amount of personal information was now available to me, a COMPLETE STRANGER (but that is a rant for a whole ‘nother post, not this one). I also read the comments, interested in what people had to say about this situation. There were people wishing them luck on their search, and several people very concerned about whether or not his adoptive parents were supportive or okay with his choice to find his birth parents, but no one, NO ONE, expressed any concern about the birth mother. No one.
This man was born in 1981 in California (OMFG, YOU GUYS. THIS IS ALL INFORMATION THAT WAS RIGHT ON FACEBOOK I AM SHOCKED AT HOW MUCH I KNOW ABOUT THIS GUY IT’S UNBELIEVABLE SORRY I CANNOT GET OVER THIS PART RIGHT NOW), which, although more than 30 years ago now, we can all agree is the “modern” era. As in, adoption was not something women were forced to do, if they didn’t want (generally speaking, of course, I know, I know, even in these modern times, yadda yadda, limited abortion access, I know), and giving up a child in a CLOSED adoption was most likely one of several choices this man’s birth mother was afforded at the time of his birth. What I’m trying to say, very inelegantly, is that this man was not born in 1910, or 1810, or some other time where women were generally not permitted to make these choices themselves. While I KNOW that I am presuming an awful lot about this woman, I feel reasonably sure that she had SOME ELEMENT of choice in the matter of the adoption of her child. I might, of course, be totally wrong, which has been known to happen, but even if I am wrong in this particular instance, I feel comfortable making the argument that is forthcoming (eventually, I promise).
And that argument is, simply, that this man’s birth mother made a choice to have a closed adoption FOR A REASON. And maybe it’s because my family is sort of on the other side of the equation (I’ll explain in a minute), but I think it’s deeply disrespectful of the wishes of the birth mother to harness social media (or a private investigator, or a psychic, or a shaman, or whatever) to find her, when she SO CLEARLY made her wishes known.
You and I don’t need to know her reason. There are a million times in our lives where we will simply not know the reason for something. Even her child, obviously adopted into a loving family, is not OWED an explanation, or a meeting, or even any information about his birth mother, simply because she declined to offer it. I am aware that this might be an unpopular opinion, and I don’t care. If I were to make such a momentous choice, and to decide, in my right mind, that I wanted the make the adoption closed, so that my offspring couldn’t find me, then I would hope that everyone involved, the nurses, the agency, the loved ones in my life who knew what I’d done, would have the decency to respect my decision. They might not like it, and that’s fine. I’ll hazard that there are people in my life RIGHT NOW who do not approve of my choice to not work in my chosen field in order to stay home with my child, and they’re entitled to their opinion, as long as they RESPECT me enough to not bother me about it.
But what if she was YOUNG and IMPRESSIONABLE and CHANGED HER MIND, I hear people out there saying. While I allow that it may be possible that she did, in fact, later in life, wish that she hadn’t closed the adoption, the fact is that she did. That at the time, she made the decision that was best for her, and now she, and the resultant offspring, have to live with that. We’ve all made decisions that we wish we could change now, in retrospect, but life doesn’t work that way. You don’t get to change the fact that you ate an entire pint of Ben & Jerry’s, no matter how much you regret it. She doesn’t get to magically open her adoption because somehow, now, she thinks she made the wrong choice.
[GIANT ASIDE: I don't know, man. I think people making those sorts of arguments about the birth mother changing her mind are being kinda douchey about it. You think a woman, no matter how young, just gives a child up for adoption easily? Like, with no thought about the potential ramifications? That's the same argument people are making about women using abortion like birth control, and I DEFINITELY think those people are douches.]
What does this have to do with me? J and I chose an anonymous sperm donor for Olivia. We had the choice between an anonymous donor and one who was “willing to be known,” and we chose the anonymous donor, SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE he was anonymous. While I understand that someday, Olivia may want to know “where she came from,” the truth will be that she came from our love and our dedication to raising her. She will have no way of contacting the man who offered her his DNA, and she will have to live with that fact. It will be NONE OF HER BUSINESS why he chose to donate anonymously, and it will be one of the millions of things in life she will just have to accept. She will also have to accept that her parents are gay and her eye squinch shut when she smiles, and there will be nothing she can do to change those things. This might sound harsh and terrible, but COME ON. There are tons of things we force our children to JUST DEAL WITH, whether it be broccoli or little siblings. In the grand scheme of things, it’s really, really not that big a deal. REALLY.
BUT WHAT ABOUT HER MEDICAL HISTORY, I hear those same people yelling. Oh, fuck off. Did you straight parents interview the person you were planning on having children with regards to their medical history? “Oh, I was GOING to have kids with you, but your mom has breast cancer. NEVERMIND.” At the time of his donation, our donor was somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 years old, with 2 living parents in good health. He doesn’t know JACK SHIT about his medical history, and besides, any HUGE genetic anomalies would have disqualified him from donating IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Olivia will never meet the man who gave her some DNA, and I really don’t think her life will be any poorer for it. I hope she doesn’t spend time searching for someone who doesn’t want to be known, or time worrying about or missing someone who’s express wish was not to know her. What a waste of a beautiful and amazing life that would be.
So, good luck, David Smith, born in Chico, California, in 1981. But I hope you don’t find out who your birth mom is because some asshole on Facebook decided her privacy and desires aren’t really that important.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 3, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Teacher Goes Back to School
Yes, yes, yes. I hope she gets to live in peace as well.
I am an adoptive mom and I think there are lots of misconceptions about birth moms. I wrote about it a couple months ago for the Things I am Afraid to Tell You series.
Anyway, thank you for sharing your story.
February 4, 2013 at 12:17 pm
mrsclare
Can I tell you James knows who his parents are and knows diddly about his medical history. It seems we have to largely healthy kids even without it.
And yes, I agree. The scenario of the forced adoption, the regret of giving up, etc. is overly sentimental and romantic. I don’t think the choice to give your kid up is romantic. I imagine it is very hard. I can also imagine thinking and feeling like it is really the best thing to do, being able to live with it AND being comforted by having a closed adoption wherein I can go on thinking it made their life better and do not have relive it ever again. When I saw that pic going around I assumed it was hoax
February 5, 2013 at 2:01 pm
Home Sweet Sarah
WELL PUT.
I think people often forget it’s not all about them and decide that because THEY feel a certain way, they can take liberties with other peoples’ choices/thoughts/feelings. It’s not fair and it’s not appropriate and OMG people, stop making everything about YOU.
I was not adopted, but I didn’t know my biological father really at all growing up, but had recently been to Israel to see him and his family when I then met and got engaged to Chris. I thought the natural thing to do would be to invite him to the wedding, until my dad (the person my mom married when I was 5) asked me to uninvite them because he didn’t feel comfortable with them at my wedding, since this person had had nothing to do with my upbringing, etc.
I did uninvite the biodad and then I felt (still feel, sometimes) a giant side of guilt that I could be so unaware as to make this all about ME without even thinking of how my dad would feel. Not only did I have to have a very awkward conversation, but I also hurt my dad’s feelings AND THEN my biodad’s feelings. All of this could have been avoided if I’d just been like, “Okay, let’s think this through for a second.”
So, all this to say, I GET that this happens, but it doesn’t make it okay (especially not on social media with all that private, personal information, MY GOD) and I agree with you that I hope he doesn’t find her. I can’t see any good stemming for that except 10 years from now when he has a similar, “Oh wow that was really selfish and inappropriate” epiphany.
Anyway, how’s ATL treating you ladies?
February 10, 2013 at 6:43 pm
A'Dell
I can’t believe it took me an entire WEEK to find the time to come back and leave a comment but it DID and YES YES YES to all of this, AGREEEEEEEEE!
I didn’t see that particular meme on Facebook but MAN does it bother me when I see things LIKE that, and in this particular instance it feels so…grimy and underhanded. It feels like an abuse of technology that didn’t even EXIST when certain decisions were made. Just because you CAN make a big stink about something in a public forum doesn’t mean you should, you know? (ICKY.)
But, yes. Everything YES. I would clap my hands if you could hear me.
(ATL! How’s that going?!)
March 13, 2013 at 3:46 pm
K
All I have to say to this is, “Holy smokes.” and that I agree with you 100%.
April 10, 2013 at 11:45 am
Economama
You obviously have a much more first-hand experience with this than I do, but I feel like perhaps it is a touch harsh/naive to suggest that your daughter will “just have to deal with” not knowing who her sperm donor was, or that dealing with it will be the saming as dealing with other immutable aspects of who she is. Yes, people deal with this, but that doesn’t mean that dealing with it is not hard or painful for them, that it is not something they struggle with. The impression that I got from reading a little on the subject (http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2010/06/the_spermdonor_kids_are_not_really_all_right.html) is that as much as we would like to deny the importance of biology or its pull on us, in reality, it often does matter to people, sometimes in ways that can be hard to understand
I started this comment earlier today and keep going back and forth on whether to actually post it, as I certainly don’t wish to “troll” you or to in any way seem like I am questioning the legitimacy of your family or how it came to be. And of course, how you handle things within your family is no one’s business but your own, but to me comparing the struggle a person might experience as they come to terms with knowing or not knowing an aspect of their background to the annoyance of having to deal with a disliked vegetable like broccoli, is, at the very least, rather flippant.
April 12, 2013 at 11:47 am
Noemi
I don’t think you’re trolling, but I do have a couple things to say in response- first of all, the study referenced in the Slate article is written, in part, by a woman displeased with finding out LATE IN LIFE that she was the product of sperm donation, making her immediately incapable of developing an objective study. Second of all, the organization publishing the study, while claiming to be non-partisan, is clearly affiliated with the Christian church, and no where on the website does it say that the study is peer-reviewed, which is, for me, the number one indicator that the study is flawed. It’s relatively common knowledge that you can write a survey in such a way as to skew the answers to be what you’d like them to be. All of this to say that I think you should read this article and study with a truckload of salt.
I’d also like to point out that my child will know that she is the product of sperm donation- this will never be hidden from her, unlike some of the people described in the Slate article. I think that it can be VERY HARD to detangle the feelings of betrayal one might experience upon finding out as an adult that you were the product of donation from your real feelings on donor-assisted conception.
Third, this is treading dangerously close to the sort of argument one makes against gay couples using assisted reproduction technologies at all. If my partner and I decide to have a child, we NEED a sperm donor, and fortunately, there are some out there, and no law yet exists to prevent my from using this technology.
A few more thoughts- the donor we picked decided ON HIS OWN to be anonymous. Just like the birth mother I talked about in the first part of my post, HE made a conscious decision to be anonymous, and it’s not my place to disrespect his decision. And if, by chance, my daughter does feel bad about not knowing who her donor is (I categorically refuse to call him her FATHER, or OH MY FUCKING GOD, her DADDY), I will do everything in my power to help her through that. Everything in my power does not, however, include disrespecting the wishes of her sperm donor, or posting all his pertinent information on Facebook.